Other / Other / MRI

Antrochoanal polyps (ACP)

Antrochoanal polyps present with nasal obstruction and/or sinus symptoms, typically in young adults (3rd-5th decades), and may occasionally prolapse posteriorly enough to be visible through the mouth hanging from the nasopharynx.
Look For First
  • Unilateral mass arising from maxillary sinus with mucin density
  • Extension through widened maxillary ostium into nasopharynx
  • Narrow pedicle or stalk base (though often not evident on CT imaging)
Key Image Findings
  • CT shows a well-defined mass with mucin density originating from the maxillary antrum, which is the gold-standard imaging modality due to exquisite bony detail of paranasal sinus anatomy.
  • Smooth enlargement and widening of the maxillary sinus ostium (accessory ostium) with extension of the polyp mass into the nasopharynx.
  • No associated bony destruction is present; the sinus walls show smooth remodeling rather than erosive changes.
  • Coronal CT or coronal reformatted images best demonstrate the characteristic features of antrochoanal polyps and their anatomic relationship to the choana.
  • On MRI, T1 signal is intermediate to low, while T2 signal is characteristically high and homogeneous in typical cases.
  • MRI with contrast (Gd) demonstrates peripheral enhancement on post-contrast T1 images.
  • Long-standing or fungally infected polyps may show higher CT density (increased Hounsfield values) and variable T2 signal intensity on MRI.
  • Plain radiographs may show unilateral maxillary sinus opacification and occasionally bilateral involvement (23-42%), but CT is the preferred diagnostic modality.
Differential Diagnosis
  • Inverted papilloma: typically shows more aggressive imaging features with bony destruction and cerebriform appearance, whereas antrochoanal polyps have smooth sinus enlargement without erosion.
  • Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA): enhances intensely and shows prominent vascularity with flow voids; antrochoanal polyps show only peripheral enhancement.
  • Hypertrophied turbinate: arises from the turbinate bones themselves rather than from the maxillary sinus, and lacks the characteristic stalk.
  • Nasoethmoidal encephalocele: shows CSF signal on MRI and defect in the cribriform plate; antrochoanal polyps have mucinous signal.
  • Maxillary sinus mucocele: lacks the characteristic stalk from the maxillary sinus and does not extend into the nasopharynx.
  • Sinonasal organized hematoma: may mimic antrochoanal polyps but clinical history and variable T1/T2 signal reflecting hemosiderin deposition can help distinguish.
Discussion

Antrochoanal polyps represent only ~5% of all sinonasal polyps and are unusual among sinonasal polyps in that they typically occur in non-atopic patients, unlike other inflammatory polyps.

The exact etiology is unknown, but chronic infection is thought to be a common causative association, present in ~25% of cases.

Pathologically, antrochoanal polyps are identical to other inflammatory polyps but characteristically have a narrow stalk arising from the maxillary sinus, which distinguishes them anatomically.

The narrow pedicle can lead to vascular compromise causing secondary changes including hemorrhage, organizing hematoma, neovascular changes, and papillary endothelial hyperplasia.

The antral portion of the polyp shows a central cystic cavity surrounded by homogeneous edematous stroma with few cells, which correlates with the high T2 signal seen on MRI.

Complete surgical excision of the stalk base is critical for treatment success, as incomplete removal results in a recurrence rate of ~50%, whereas complete excision achieves only ~7% recurrence.

Reporting Pearls

Describe the location, size, and relationship to the maxillary ostium clearly: "A mass arises from the maxillary antrum, widening the maxillary ostium, with extension into the nasopharynx consistent with an antrochoanal polyp; note the origin from the maxillary sinus and ensure the surgical team understands the need for complete stalk excision to minimize recurrence."

Pitfalls
  • Failure to identify the maxillary sinus origin of the mass—the polyp can appear to be primarily a nasopharyngeal mass on axial images alone; coronal imaging is essential to demonstrate the characteristic origin and stalk.
  • Mistaking the polyp for other nasopharyngeal masses such as JNA or inverted papilloma based on location alone; careful attention to imaging signal characteristics and extent of enhancement helps distinguish these entities.
  • Underestimating the importance of CT imaging and relying on plain radiographs, which lack the detail needed to confirm sinus origin, characterize the mass, and guide surgical planning.
  • Not recognizing that the narrow pedicle/stalk may not be visible on imaging despite being the pathologically defining feature; communicate to surgeons that complete stalk excision is critical even if not clearly delineated on preoperative imaging.